Four rules. Every one measured on 1232 real trades across 87 wallets.
No signals. No calls. No promises. Just what the numbers say.
The single strongest entry filter we found. Tokens with a larger implied market cap at the moment of entry win far more often - because a small trade cannot move them, and yours does not either.
Same wallets. Same period. The only difference is the size of what they bought.
When four independent traders enter the same token within minutes of each other, outcomes improve sharply - and it holds even on small tokens, where the size floor alone would have told you to stay out.
Independence is what matters. We cluster wallets that trade the same coins, because one person running four addresses is not four opinions.
Across 7,371 trades we timed every entry against the moment the token launched. The first sixty seconds are a different market from everything after.
But speed alone is not skill - the worst wallets we track are also the fastest. Being early is a requirement, not an edge.
Gains are brutally concentrated. The best 5% of trades produced most of everything won, while under a third of trades made money at all. That is not a flaw in the strategy - it is the shape of it.
Concentrate and you will most likely miss it. Many small equal positions is not timidity - it is the only structure that survives long enough to catch the trade that pays.
Every cell above still had a negative average return over our sample window. These rules raise how often you are right - they are not a way to make money on demand, and anyone who tells you otherwise is selling something.
We publish grades, not calls. We do not execute trades, hold funds, or take a cut of yours - which also means we can never trade against you.
Not what the trader made - what was left after a realistic delay. Every wallet on our board is scored that way, and the gap between the two is usually enormous.